首页> 外文OA文献 >Are State legislatures responding to public opinion when allocating funds for tobacco control programs?
【2h】

Are State legislatures responding to public opinion when allocating funds for tobacco control programs?

机译:国家立法机构在为烟草控制计划分配资金时是否回应民意?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study explored the factors associated with state-level allocations to tobacco-control programs. The primary research question was whether public sentiment regarding tobacco control was a significant factor in the states' 2001 budget decisions. In addition to public opinion, several additional political and economic measures were considered. Significant associations were found between our outcome, state-level tobacco-control funding per capita, and key variables of interest including public opinion, amount of tobacco settlement received, the party affiliation of the governor, the state's smoking rate, excise tax revenue received, and whether the state was a major producer of tobacco. The findings from this study supported our hypothesis that states with citizens who favor more restrictive indoor air policies allocate more to tobacco control. Effective public education to change public opinion and the cultural norms surrounding smoking may affect political decisions and, in turn, increase funding for crucial public health programs.
机译:这项研究探索了与烟草控制计划的州级分配相关的因素。主要的研究问题是公众对烟草控制的看法是否是各州2001年预算决定的重要因素。除了舆论外,还考虑了其​​他一些政治和经济措施。在我们的结果,人均州级烟草控制资金与感兴趣的关键变量之间发现了显着关联,这些变量包括民意,收到的烟草和解量,州长的党派关系,州的吸烟率,收到的消费税收入,以及该州是否是主要的烟草生产国。这项研究的结果支持了我们的假设,即那些赞成更严格的室内空气政策的州将更多的烟草分配给烟草控制。进行有效的公众教育以改变舆论和围绕吸烟的文化规范,可能会影响政治决策,进而增加用于关键公共卫生计划的资金。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号